57

Visa reason code 57, explained for merchants

Under the older Visa rules, code 57 covered a cardholder who admitted one purchase but denied the rest. Here is when it applied and how to fight it.

Network
Old Visa codes
Published

What is Visa reason code 57?

Under the older Visa rules, reason code 57 was Fraudulent Multiple Transactions. It was one of the fraud codes a merchant could see on a chargeback notice.

The claim behind it was narrow. A cardholder admitted making one purchase at a store, but denied other charges from that same store. The issuer used code 57 to take back the money for the charges the cardholder denied.

Visa has since consolidated its 22 legacy reason codes into four dispute categories. If your notice shows a code from the newer system, the old code pages still explain the kind of claim behind it.

When does a code 57 chargeback apply?

Code 57 applied to a specific pattern. The cardholder had to admit at least one transaction at the merchant. Then they had to say they did not make the other ones.

All the disputed charges had to come from the same store. A cardholder who denied charges from two different merchants would not fit this code.

The sale also had to be made with the card present. The cardholder handed over a card, or a terminal read it, for the charge they admitted. The extra charges were the ones in question.

What does code 57 not cover?

A code 57 chargeback was not valid for a sale made when the card was not present. Online orders, phone orders and mail orders did not fit. If the card never touched the terminal, this was the wrong code.

Visa had other codes for card-absent fraud. See Visa reason code 83 for the older fraud code that covered those sales. For card-present fraud under the old numbering, see Visa reason code 81.

Other networks have their own codes for denied charges. Mastercard uses reason code 4837 when a cardholder says they never authorized a sale. Its reason code 4849 covers a different kind of merchant problem.

How to defend against a code 57 chargeback

A merchant could fight a code 57 chargeback with strong proof that the cardholder took part in the disputed charges. The goal was to show the extra charges were not fraud.

Good proof showed the same card, the same cardholder, or both at the time of the disputed sales. Some examples:

  • A signed receipt for a disputed charge, with a signature that matches the card
  • A terminal record showing the card was read in person for each sale
  • Video from the store showing the same person at each purchase
  • A store log showing the same clerk or register handled the admitted sale and the disputed ones close in time

Proof that only covers the admitted sale does not help. The cardholder already agreed to that one. Your documents must speak to the charges they denied.

Check the time limit on the notice before you build your reply. Each step of a Visa dispute has a set deadline, and a late answer can lose the case. If the notice is hard to read, start with how to read a chargeback notice.

Code 57 sat in the fraud group, so the issuer claimed the cardholder never made the extra charges. Fraud claims need proof that ties the cardholder to the sale. Processing claims need proof of a correct transaction instead.

Your reply is rarely the last step. The issuer can drop the case, or push it into a later round. See what happens after you answer a chargeback for the rounds that can follow, and keep copies of everything you send.

Sources